Restrain pre-President Hussein's person, International Community


The judgement of UN Security Council was correct.
"The judgement" is the judgement of UN Security Council before the Iraq War, which did not approve the United State's resolution, which assert Iraq War.

"An imminent threat to the world of mass-destruction weapons in Iraq" which the United States asserts was not exist.
The threat of Iraq, which the United States asserted, was demagogy.

UN Security Council did calm judgement before Iraq War.
UN Security Council did not deceived by the intelligence manipulations of the United States, and did not approve Iraq attack by the United States.
Look back over the past, It is clear that this judgement was correct.


But after Iraq war, UN Security Council resolved UN Security Council resolution 1483(After this "resolution 1483").

Resolution 1483 has following 2 meanings.
(1) The ex post facto approval of Iraq war by the United States.
(2) The approval of Iraq rule of the United states.

UN Security Council took back its judgement of before Iraq war.
Why>
It is because UN Security Council accepted rightness of Iraq war, which the United States asserts.

Resolution 1483 was resolved on the premise that the rightness of Iraq war, which the United States, asserts.
But, the assertion of the United States was lie
The rightness of Iraq war was lost
The premise of resolution 1483 tumbled down.

Resolution 1483 must be re-considered.


Resolution 1483 has 2 problems.
(1) The point which it approve the rightness of Iraq war.
(2) The point which it approve Iraq rule of the United States

Further, "(2) The point which it approve Iraq rule of the United States" is divided 2 problems.
(2-1) The point which it give the United States authority to manage resources of Iraq freely.
(2-2) The point which it give the United States authority which is head and shoulder above the sovereignty of Iraq People.

"(2-1) The point which it give the United States authority to manage resources of Iraq freely." is following.
Now, the proceeds of Iraq Oil are managed by the United States.
Iraq Oil is national property of Iraq.
The United States has no concession of Iraq Oil.

However
The United States deal in Iraq oil, and manages its proceed.
It is theft.
In this case, it has military backing. So,
It is plunder.
To approve the dealing of Iraq Oil by the United States means to approve plunder.

Resolution 1483 has a problem because it approves "plunder".

"(2-2) The point which it give the United States authority which is head and shoulder above the sovereignty of Iraq People." is following.
Sovereignty resides in the people is a right to construct their country by themselves.
And, the country is the greatest base of safety for the people.
When the people are stripped their sovereignty, the people lost means to protect themselves.

As results, the people stripped their sovereignty is,
Outraged
Tortured
Killed

Certainly, A violent of human rights of Iraq people by U.S. forces is an everyday affair.
a) Bloody U.S. Raid in Baghdad Leaves Iraqis Furious; Five Civilians Killed
By Cynthia Johnston
July 28, 2003
http://www.ccmep.org/2003_articles/Iraq/072803_bloody_us.htm
b) Amnesty: Iraqis Complain of Torture by U.S. Forces
Published on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 by Reuters
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0723-01.htm

Resolution 1483 has a problem because it approves "A violent of human rights".

"(1) The point which it approve the rightness of Iraq war." is following.
In 2002/8/15, the United States announced "The Pre-emptive Strike doctrine".
The substance of this doctrine is following.

Counter a threat by The Pre-emptive Strike and remove the threat.

Iraq war is the first case which "The Pre-emptive Strike doctrine" is dispatched.

The progress of Iraq war if following.
The United States
1) Made up a threat of Iraq.
2) Made anti-Iraq propaganda
3) Miss led the international public opinion.
4) In spite of UN Security Council's and the International Community's opposition
5) Attacked Iraq.

6) Occupies Iraq.
7) Split the sovereignty of Iraq people.
8) Plundered the resource of Iraq.

It is the very an aggressor war.

Judge from the progress of Iraq war, that "The Pre-emptive Strike doctrine" is logic for an aggressor war.
To accept "The Pre-emptive Strike doctrine" for the country all over the world means to give a freedom of aggression to the United States.


It is dangerous.
It means that there is a potential that the United States invades the countries all over the world.

It is related to instability of the world situation

Actually, its sign has already appeared.
It is an armament race.

Now, some country starts the expansion of armaments includes nuclearize.

If this armament race make progress, then the world will get into a touch-and-go situation.

The International Community should cut off this trend.

But, resolution 1483 affects reverse.
Resolution 1483 authorizes the aggression war by the United States.

Resolution 1483 has a problem because it approves "An aggressive War".


The point which it approve "An aggression war"
The point which it approve "Plunder"
The point which it approve "A violent of human rights"

Resolution 1483 has these problems.

Resolution 1483 must be retracted.

And, it is necessary to resolve new Iraq revival plan at UN Security Council.
This new Iraq revival plan must be removed the interference of the United States.


After Iraq war, UN Security Council resolved "Resolution 1483".

Why such a doubtful resolution resolved in UN Security Council?
It is because UN Security Council member countries could not present the ground of argument, which can deny the rightness of Iraq war.

Why?

In short, the cause which UN Security Council approved the aggression war of the United States was the shortage of intelligence of the countries except for the United States.

UN Security Council must have intelligence power.


It is necessary to prevent the refutation of the United States to turn retract Resolution 1483 into reality.
For that purpose, it is necessary to present the ground of argument, which the United States cannot oppose.
For that purpose, it is necessary that UN Security Council member countries except for the United States have the intelligence power overwhelm the United States.

But, it is only the United States, which has intelligence about the mass-destruction weapons of Iraq.
It is difficult to abolish intelligence differential.

So, what shoo are done?

There is a person who has intelligence about the mass-destruction weapons of Iraq overwhelms the United States.
Catch the person.

Who is it?
It is pre-President Hussein.
pre-Presidents Hussein is only person who have intelligence about the mass-destruction weapons of Iraq overwhelm the United States.

It is dispensable to get the intelligence, which this person has to prevent the opposition by the United States.
For the purpose of it, it is dispensable to restrain pre-President Hussein's person.



Retract Resolution 1483.
And, resolve new Iraq revival Plan that removes the interference of the United States.
It is first step to take world order back.

But, keen opposition by the United States is expected, until reach the goal.

It is necessary to prevent the opposition by the United States.
For the purpose of it, it is necessary to apply pressure to the United States not to admit of oppose

For it, the intelligence about mass-destruction weapons is indispensable.
To get this intelligence, pre-President Hussein's person is needed.



Finally
Dear anti-Hussein power
Have you fought for the purpose to make Iraq such a country of present?

***********************************************
v(^o^)v daisy Chun Jiuqien
( x ) daisy ICQ:38969410
m m=* daisy e-mail:chunjiuqien@infoseek.jp
***********************************************


/*
This statement is
COPY FREE
MODIFICATION NG
ATTRIBUTION FREE
COMMERCIAL OK
*/
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

[Page Top]
[back]